Fuller v. Fuller

Ohio Supreme Court

Fuller v. Fuller

93 Ohio St. 3d 1272

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 28, 2001

Docket01-1706

StatusPublished

This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1272 (Fuller v. Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fuller v. Fuller, 93 Ohio St. 3d 1272 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Scioto App. No. 99CA2687. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due September 21, 2001, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this case with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this _ cause be, and hereby is dismissed, sua sponte.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scioto App. No. 99CA2687. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due September 21, 2001, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this case with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this _ cause be, and hereby is dismissed, sua sponte.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 Ohio St. 3d 1272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-fuller-ohio-2001.