Fuller v. Fuller

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Fuller v. Fuller

124 S.E. 53, 32 Ga. App. 497, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 498

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 15, 1924

Docket15593

StatusPublished

This text of 124 S.E. 53 (Fuller v. Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fuller v. Fuller, 124 S.E. 53, 32 Ga. App. 497, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 498 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. There is nothing in the alleged newly discovered evidence that takes it out of the general rule that such evidence, when merely cumulative and impeaching -in its character, will not require the grant of a new trial.

2. There was some evidence to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. J. II. Paschall, for plaintiff in error. A. L. Henson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

1. There is nothing in the alleged newly discovered evidence that takes it out of the general rule that such evidence, when merely cumulative and impeaching -in its character, will not require the grant of a new trial.

2. There was some evidence to support the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. J. II. Paschall, for plaintiff in error. A. L. Henson, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 S.E. 53, 32 Ga. App. 497, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-fuller-gactapp-1924.