Fuller v. Doyal

129 S.E. 117, 34 Ga. App. 245, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 199
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided August 20, 1925·No. 15929·Published

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. Property not owned by a debtor, when filing his schedule of property exempted under section 3416 of the Civil Code (1910) providing for the short or “pony” homestead, but which is afterwards acquired by him, is not subject to exemption under the schedule, although described therein. Smith v. Eckles & Abercrombie, 65 Ga. 326.

2. Fifty bushels of corn raised and produced by a debtor in the year 1922 are not exempt from levy and sale by virtue of a schedule which was made out on the 11th day of November, 1921, exempting fifty bushels of corn, as provided in the above-cited code section.

3. The judge of the superior court properly overruled a certiorari brought by the defendant, excepting to á verdict and judgment in the justice’s court, finding the property levied on subject to the levy and not exempt under the schedule.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenleins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fuller v. Doyal, 129 S.E. 117, 34 Ga. App. 245, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 199 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

129 S.E. 117 (Fuller v. Doyal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Eckles & Abercrombie
65 Ga. 326 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1880)