Fuller v. Dixon
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION No. 7:21-CV-40-D
NAPIER SANDFORD FULLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ORDER
SEAN MATTHEW DIXON, and ) NEW HANOVER COUNTY, ) ) Defendants. )
On August 11, 2022, the court granted in part defendants’ motions to dismiss [D.E. 19, 30], dismissed plaintiff s federal claims, and closed the case. See [D.E. 38, 39]. On October 28, 2022, the court denied plaintiff s motions for reconsideration, to compel discovery, and for an extension of time to appeal [D.E. 45]. On November 28, 2022, Fuller filed a notice of appeal [D.E. 50]. Fuller has flooded the court with motions [D.E. 46, 47, 48, 49, 56, 57, 62]. The court lacks jurisdiction to consider the motions. See Griggs v. Provident Consumer Disc. Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982) (per curiam); Dickson v. United States, 710 F. App’x 608, 609-10 (4th Cir. 2018) (per curiam) (unpublished); Clark v. Cartledge, 829 F.3d 303, 305 (4th Cir. 2016); Doe v. Pub. Citizen, 749 F.3d 246, 258 (4th Cir. 2014). Thus, the court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE plaintiff's motions [D.E. 46, 47, 48, 49, 56, 57, 62]. SO ORDERED. This _1_ day of September, 2023.
4—) AM RA, J S C. DEVER Il United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fuller v. Dixon (Fuller v. Dixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.