Fuller v. Davis
63 Miss. 78
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The assignee of the note was not the “ legal representative ” of the payees, so as to be entitled to substitute a trustee under a provision in a deed of trust authorizing the payees “ or their legal representatives ” to appoint another trustee. An assignee claims in his own right, and not in a representative character.
Afirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fuller v. Davis, 63 Miss. 78 (Mich. 1885).
63 Miss. 78 (Fuller v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hill v. James
175 So. 2d 176 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1965)
Laird v. Bethea
60 So. 2d 526 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1952)
Shiya v. Erickson
156 Misc. 738 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1935)