Fuller v. Continental Plastic Co.
This text of 7 F.3d 1044 (Fuller v. Continental Plastic Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
7 F.3d 1044
NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.
George F. FULLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CONTINENTAL PLASTIC COMPANY; Ann Bennett, Human Resources
Supervisor at Continental Plastic Company; Local 233 GMP
Union; and Dale Jeter, Representative of GMP Union Local
233, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-3015.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
Oct. 5, 1993.
Before LOGAN, MOORE, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT1
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
AFFIRMED for the reasons stated by the district court in its order of December 30, 1992.
This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 F.3d 1044, 1993 WL 389460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-continental-plastic-co-ca10-1993.