Fuller v. Com. of Va.

54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17411, 1995 WL 308892
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 19, 1995
Docket95-1132
StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 773 (Fuller v. Com. of Va.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fuller v. Com. of Va., 54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17411, 1995 WL 308892 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

54 F.3d 773
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Michael R. FULLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COM. of Va.; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of
Virginia; Ann Simpson Jones; William Tignor; Kathryn
Burner; Carolyn E. Carlson, State Hearing Officer, Bureau
of Customer Services, Social Services; Judge Scott, General
District Court, Stafford, Virginia; Ralph Williams,
Sheriff; Daniel M. Chichester; Allen Bareford, Public
Defender's Office; Joseph A. Synan; Thomas Moncure, Chief
Clerk, Circuit Court; Scott Bates, former Secretary of the
Commonwealth, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-1132.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: May 19, 1995.

Michael R. Fuller, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his request for information under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C.A. Sec. 552 (West 1977 & Supp.1994), as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fuller v. Virginia, No. CA-95-32-R (E.D. Va. Jan. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 F.3d 773, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17411, 1995 WL 308892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-com-of-va-ca4-1995.