Fuller v. Camus

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 20, 2005·No. 05-1028·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1028

RALPH L. FULLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SAM CAMUS, d/b/a United States Marshals Service, Premier Trends; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees, versus

BRENDA S. HAMILTON, Clerk,

Party in Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-04-275-7)

Submitted: June 30, 2005 Decided: July 20, 2005

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ralph L. Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. John Weber, III, WEBER PEARSON P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Ralph L. Fuller appeals the district court’s orders

granting the Government’s motion to dismiss Fuller’s civil action

for lack of jurisdiction and denying his request to amend the

court’s judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Fuller v. Camus, No. CA-04-275-7 (W.D. Va.

Oct. 27 and Nov. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fuller v. Camus, (4th Cir. 2005).

Fuller v. Camus (Fuller v. Camus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.