Fuller v. Cadwell

88 Mass. 503
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1863
StatusPublished

This text of 88 Mass. 503 (Fuller v. Cadwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fuller v. Cadwell, 88 Mass. 503 (Mass. 1863).

Opinion

Metcalf, J.

This demurrer must be sustained and the bill dismissed. The plaintiff needs no injunction, and is entitled to none. The statements in the bill, which are admitted by the demurrer, show a perfect legal defence to the action of which he prays the court to restrain the prosecution. And nothing is alleged in the bill from which it appears that he cannot as well prove his defence, on the trial of that action, as he could on a hearing of this bill, if the defendants had filed an answer denying its allegations.

A court of equity does not issue an injunction to stay proceedings at law where the rights of a party can be fully sustained in a court of law. 3 Dan. Ch. Pr. 1840. Drewry on Injunctions, 10-12. 2 Story on Eq. §§ 882, 894. 3 Eq. Cas. Abr. 524. Derbyshire, &c. Railway Co. v. Serrell, 2 De Gex & Sm. 353. Anderson v. Dowling, 11 Irish Eq. Rep. 590. New York Dry Dock Co. v. American Life Ins. & Trust Co. 11 Paige, 384. Morris Canal & Banking Co. v. Dennis, 1 Beasley, (N. J.) 249.

Bill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New-York Dry Dock Co. v. American Life Insurance & Trust Co.
11 Paige Ch. 384 (New York Court of Chancery, 1844)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 Mass. 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-cadwell-mass-1863.