Fuller v. Broadus-Little

411 S.E.2d 269, 261 Ga. 653
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 1, 1991
DocketS91A1350
StatusPublished

This text of 411 S.E.2d 269 (Fuller v. Broadus-Little) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fuller v. Broadus-Little, 411 S.E.2d 269, 261 Ga. 653 (Ga. 1991).

Opinion

Smith, Presiding Justice.

After reviewing the case, the trial judge entered an order for arbitration. The three arbitrators found in favor of the appellant in the amount of $11,421.79 plus interest. The appellee, Evelyn BroadusLittle, appealed from the award.

The trial court granted the appellee’s motion for summary judgment on the main complaint and also granted the appellee’s motion for summary judgment on her counterclaim for abusive litigation. We affirm as to the main complaint and reverse as to the counterclaim.

There was no error in the court’s grant of a summary judgment as to the main complaint. However, the court erred in granting summary judgment on the appellee’s abusive litigation counterclaim.

Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
411 S.E.2d 269, 261 Ga. 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-broadus-little-ga-1991.