Fuller ex rel. Fuller v. Bright
138 S.E.2d 37, 262 N.C. 543, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 679
This text of 138 S.E.2d 37 (Fuller ex rel. Fuller v. Bright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fuller ex rel. Fuller v. Bright, 138 S.E.2d 37, 262 N.C. 543, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 679 (N.C. 1964).
Opinion
All the plaintiff’s assignments of error are to the charge of the court or to the failure of the court to charge the jury in certain respects.
A careful review of the charge, however, when read contextually, leads us to the conclusion that sufficient prejudicial error has not been shown to justify a new trial.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
138 S.E.2d 37, 262 N.C. 543, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-ex-rel-fuller-v-bright-nc-1964.