Fullam v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.
103 A. 718, 260 Pa. 366, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 522
This text of 103 A. 718 (Fullam v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fullam v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co., 103 A. 718, 260 Pa. 366, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 522 (Pa. 1918).
Opinion
Judgment was properly entered for the defendant non obstante veredicto for the first two reasons assigned by learned counsel for appellee in asking for it, and it is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
103 A. 718, 260 Pa. 366, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fullam-v-philadelphia-reading-railway-co-pa-1918.