Full Harvest Technologies, Inc. v. Mayan Farmers Produce, LLC, et al

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT November 07, 2025 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk MCALLEN DIVISION FULL HARVEST TECHNOLOGIES, § INC., § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Civil Action No. 7:25-CV-00223 § MAYAN FARMERS PRODUCE, LLC, § et al, § § Defendants. § ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pending before the Court is the September 18, 2025, Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) prepared by Magistrate Judge J. Scott Hacker. (Dkt. No. 85). Judge Hacker made findings and conclusions and recommended that Defendant Real Estate J&S Mur, LLC’s Rule 55(c) Motion, (Dkt. No. 55), be GRANTED, and that the default entered against it, (Dkt. No. 35), be SET ASIDE pursuant to Rule 55(c). Judge Hacker further recommended that J&S Mur’s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint, (Dkt. No. 56), be GRANTED. The Parties were provided proper notice and the opportunity to object to the M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No party filed an objection. As a result, review is straightforward: plain error. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005). No plain error appears. Accordingly, the Court accepts the M&R and adopts it as the opinion of the Court. It is therefore ordered that: (1) Judge Hacker’s M&R, (Dkt. No. 85), is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; (2) | Defendant Real Estate J&S Mur, LLC’s Rule 55(c) Motion, (Dkt. No. 55), is GRANTED; (3) The default entered against Defendant Real Estate J&S Mur, LLC, (Dkt. No. 35), is SET ASIDE pursuant to Rule 55(c); and (4) Defendant Real Estate J&S Mur, LLC’s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint, (Dkt. No. 56), is GRANTED. Real Estate J&S Mur is ORDERED to respond to the Complaint, (Dkt. No. 1), by November 21, 2025. It is SO ORDERED. Signed on November 7, 2025.

DREW B. TIPTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE