Fulglram v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Alabama

Fulglram v. Roberts

75 Ala. 341

DecidedDecember 15, 1883

StatusPublished

This text of 75 Ala. 341 (Fulglram v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fulglram v. Roberts, 75 Ala. 341 (Ala. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

STONE, J.

The present suit was brought in January, 1881, for an alleged injury committed before that time. In Roberts v. Pippen, at this term [ante p. 103], we ruled that neither the act “to amend section 2681 of the Code,” (Pamph. Acts,1880-1, p. 31), nor the act to amend said act, approved February 5th, 1883, (Pamph. Acts, p. 38), affected the rights of parties, circumstanced as these were. The result of the ruling is, to require a reversal of this case in many particulars, notably, in the judgment sustaining the demurrer to the original complaint. The case must be tried without reference to either of those amenda-tory statutes. We need not particularize the errors committed.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STONE, J.

The present suit was brought in January, 1881, for an alleged injury committed before that time. In Roberts v. Pippen, at this term [ante p. 103], we ruled that neither the act “to amend section 2681 of the Code,” (Pamph. Acts,1880-1, p. 31), nor the act to amend said act, approved February 5th, 1883, (Pamph. Acts, p. 38), affected the rights of parties, circumstanced as these were. The result of the ruling is, to require a reversal of this case in many particulars, notably, in the judgment sustaining the demurrer to the original complaint. The case must be tried without reference to either of those amenda-tory statutes. We need not particularize the errors committed.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 Ala. 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulglram-v-roberts-ala-1883.