Fulghum v. Dwight

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Fulghum v. Dwight

118 S.E. 502, 30 Ga. App. 596, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 545

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 10, 1923

Docket14576

StatusPublished

This text of 118 S.E. 502 (Fulghum v. Dwight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fulghum v. Dwight, 118 S.E. 502, 30 Ga. App. 596, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 545 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The petition as amended showed that suit was brought on a certain promissory note executed by S. W. Meadows, and on a certain written agreement signed by T. H. Dwight. Meadows was sued as principal, and Dwight as surety. The court sustained a general demurrer interposed by Dwight to the petition, and dismissed the case as to him, upon the ground that it appeared from the face of the. pleadings that he would not be bound as surety on the note sued upon, and the plaintiff excepted.

Under the particular facts of the case, as shown by the amended petition, the judgment excepted to was not error.

Judgment affirmed,.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The petition as amended showed that suit was brought on a certain promissory note executed by S. W. Meadows, and on a certain written agreement signed by T. H. Dwight. Meadows was sued as principal, and Dwight as surety. The court sustained a general demurrer interposed by Dwight to the petition, and dismissed the case as to him, upon the ground that it appeared from the face of the. pleadings that he would not be bound as surety on the note sued upon, and the plaintiff excepted.

Under the particular facts of the case, as shown by the amended petition, the judgment excepted to was not error.

Judgment affirmed,.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 S.E. 502, 30 Ga. App. 596, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulghum-v-dwight-gactapp-1923.