Fulgham v. Parker

Fourth Circuit

Fulgham v. Parker

192 F. App'x 228

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 28, 2006·No. No. 06-6733·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joe Lee Fulgham appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fulgham v. Parker, No. 2:05-cv-00401-JBF (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 24, 2006 & entered Feb. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Joe Lee Fulgham appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fulgham v. Parker, No. 2:05-cv-00401-JBF (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 24, 2006 & entered Feb. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Fulgham v. Parker, 192 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

192 F. App'x 228 (Fulgham v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related