Fulgham v. Delk

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: November 29, 2005
• Docket: 05-7235
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7235

JOE LEE FULGHAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JASON DELK, Suffolk Virginia Circuit Court Judge; VIRGINIA STATE POLICE SEXUAL OFFENDER REGISTER, Virginia State Police Department,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-05-414)

Submitted: November 17, 2005 Decided: November 29, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joe Lee Fulgham, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Joe Lee Fulgham appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Fulgham v. Delk, No. CA-05-414 (E.D. Va. July 20, 2005). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -