Fulford v. State

116 S.E. 906, 30 Ga. App. 12, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 214
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 6, 1923
Docket14064
StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E. 906 (Fulford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fulford v. State, 116 S.E. 906, 30 Ga. App. 12, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 214 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition statute. The evidence was insufficient to authorize the conviction, and it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodicorth, J., concur. E.ldon L. Bowen, £. F. Memory, for plaintiff in error. S. Thomas Memory, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 S.E. 906, 30 Ga. App. 12, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulford-v-state-gactapp-1923.