Fulford v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

39 A. 1115, 185 Pa. 329, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 713
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 4, 1898
DocketAppeal, No. 86
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 39 A. 1115 (Fulford v. Lehigh Valley Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fulford v. Lehigh Valley Railroad, 39 A. 1115, 185 Pa. 329, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 713 (Pa. 1898).

Opinion

Per Ctjriam:,

This appeal is from the refusal of the court below to take off the judgment of nonsuit ordered by the learned president of the 34th judicial district who specially presided at the trial.

Without referring specially to the testimony and the absence of evidence necessary to justify submission of the case to a jury, we are satisfied that there was no error in refusing to take off the nonsuit. The assignment of error is not sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCully v. Monongahela Ry. Co.
137 A. 623 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Stitzel v. A. Wilhelm Co.
69 A. 996 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Bowen v. Pennsylvania Railroad
68 A. 963 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Simmons v. Southern Traction Co.
57 A. 45 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1904)
Fletcher v. Philadelphia Traction Co.
42 A. 527 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 A. 1115, 185 Pa. 329, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulford-v-lehigh-valley-railroad-pa-1898.