Fulford v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Fulford v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

39 A. 1115, 185 Pa. 329, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 713

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 4, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 86·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Ctjriam:,

This appeal is from the refusal of the court below to take off the judgment of nonsuit ordered by the learned president of the 34th judicial district who specially presided at the trial.

Without referring specially to the testimony and the absence of evidence necessary to justify submission of the case to a jury, we are satisfied that there was no error in refusing to take off the nonsuit. The assignment of error is not sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Ctjriam:,

This appeal is from the refusal of the court below to take off the judgment of nonsuit ordered by the learned president of the 34th judicial district who specially presided at the trial.

Without referring specially to the testimony and the absence of evidence necessary to justify submission of the case to a jury, we are satisfied that there was no error in refusing to take off the nonsuit. The assignment of error is not sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Fulford v. Lehigh Valley Railroad, 39 A. 1115, 185 Pa. 329, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 713 (Pa. 1898).

Pincite

39 A. 1115 (Fulford v. Lehigh Valley Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related