Home/U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York/Fuld & Co. v. United States

Fuld & Co. v. United States

143 F. 920, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4682
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJanuary 26, 1906
DocketNo. 4,038
StatusPublished

This text of 143 F. 920 (Fuld & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fuld & Co. v. United States, 143 F. 920, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4682 (circtsdny 1906).

Opinion

HAZEL, District Judge.

The protest does not point out specifically and distinctly the proper rate of duty in respect to the different entries, and I am of opinion that the question of sufficiency of protest is controlled by U. S. v. Fleitmann (C. C. A.) 137 Fed. 476, and U. S. v. Bayersdofer, 126 Fed. 732, 62 C. C. A. 16. The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. H. Bayersdorfer & Co.
126 F. 732 (Third Circuit, 1903)
United States v. Fleitmann
137 F. 476 (Second Circuit, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 F. 920, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuld-co-v-united-states-circtsdny-1906.