Fuld & Co. v. United States
143 F. 920, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4682
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided January 26, 1906·No. No. 4,038·Published
Opinion
The protest does not point out specifically and distinctly the proper rate of duty in respect to the different entries, and I am of opinion that the question of sufficiency of protest is controlled by U. S. v. Fleitmann (C. C. A.) 137 Fed. 476, and U. S. v. Bayersdofer, 126 Fed. 732, 62 C. C. A. 16. The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fuld & Co. v. United States, 143 F. 920, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4682 (circtsdny 1906).
143 F. 920 (Fuld & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. H. Bayersdorfer & Co.
126 F. 732 (Third Circuit, 1903)
United States v. Fleitmann
137 F. 476 (Second Circuit, 1905)