Fulcher v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Fulcher v. Smith

107 S.E.2d 68, 249 N.C. 645, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 380

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedFebruary 25, 1959

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 107 S.E.2d 68 (Fulcher v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fulcher v. Smith, 107 S.E.2d 68, 249 N.C. 645, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 380 (N.C. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PeR CüRiam.

The cause o-f action stated is for an assault. The lease and plaintiff’s occupancy pursuant thereto merely -afforded an opportunity for an -assault. The forced abandonment of plaintiff’s property to escape defendant’s advances is but an element -of -damages. The action is -transitory, not local. Clay Co. v. Clay Co., 203 N.C. 12, [646]*646164 S.E. 341; Causey v. Morris, 195 N.C. 532, 142 S.E. 783.

Affirmed.

MooRE, J., took no pant in -the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PeR CüRiam.

The cause o-f action stated is for an assault. The lease and plaintiff’s occupancy pursuant thereto merely -afforded an opportunity for an -assault. The forced abandonment of plaintiff’s property to escape defendant’s advances is but an element -of -damages. The action is -transitory, not local. Clay Co. v. Clay Co., 203 N.C. 12, [646]*646164 S.E. 341; Causey v. Morris, 195 N.C. 532, 142 S.E. 783.

Affirmed.

MooRE, J., took no pant in -the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 S.E.2d 68, 249 N.C. 645, 1959 N.C. LEXIS 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulcher-v-smith-nc-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack