Fulcher v. Hockaday

1913 OK 303, 132 P. 673, 38 Okla. 156, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 327
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMay 13, 1913
Docket4767
StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK 303 (Fulcher v. Hockaday) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fulcher v. Hockaday, 1913 OK 303, 132 P. 673, 38 Okla. 156, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 327 (Okla. 1913).

Opinion

HAYES, C. J.

This appeal is by petition in error and case-made. The record fails to show that defendant in error was present either in person or by counsel at the settlement *157 of the ease-made, or that notice of the time and place of settlement was served npon him, or waived. A motion to dismiss upon this ground, as well as upon other grounds, some of which have merit, has been hied. The facts above stated alone require that the motion should be sustained. First National Bank of Collinsville v. Daniels, 26 Okla. 383, 108 Pac. 748.

All the Justices concur, except WILLIAMS, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First Nat. Bank of Collinsville v. Daniels
1910 OK 131 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1913 OK 303, 132 P. 673, 38 Okla. 156, 1913 Okla. LEXIS 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulcher-v-hockaday-okla-1913.