Fulcher v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
35 S.E. 280, 110 Ga. 327, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 430
Opinion
The evidence showing that the plaintiff could, by the exercise of ordinary care, have avoided the consequences of the negligence of the defendant company, if the latter was negligent, the court did not err in granting a nonsuit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fulcher v. Central of Georgia Railway Co., 35 S.E. 280, 110 Ga. 327, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 430 (Ga. 1900).
35 S.E. 280 (Fulcher v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Atlantic Greyhound Corp. v. Loudermilk
110 F.2d 596 (Fifth Circuit, 1940)