Fuhrman v. WCAB

540 A.2d 267, 518 Pa. 59

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 26, 1988·Published

Opinion

518 Pa. 59 (1988) 540 A.2d 267

George FUHRMAN
v.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CLEMENS SUPERMARKET).
Appeal of CLEMENS SUPERMARKET.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued April 12, 1988. Decided April 26, 1988.

John R. Lenahan, Jr., Kathleen A. Lenahan, Scranton, for appellant.

Mark B. Segal, Philadelphia, Jerome H. Gerber, Irwin W. Aronson, James A. Diamond, Harrisburg, for amicus AFL-CIO.

Prior report: 100 Pa.Cmwlth. 577, 515 A.2d 331.

*60 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

518 Pa. 59 (1988) 540 A.2d 267

George FUHRMAN
v.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CLEMENS SUPERMARKET).
Appeal of CLEMENS SUPERMARKET.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued April 12, 1988. Decided April 26, 1988.

John R. Lenahan, Jr., Kathleen A. Lenahan, Scranton, for appellant.

Mark B. Segal, Philadelphia, Jerome H. Gerber, Irwin W. Aronson, James A. Diamond, Harrisburg, for amicus AFL-CIO.

Prior report: 100 Pa.Cmwlth. 577, 515 A.2d 331.

*60 ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

Fuhrman v. WCAB, 540 A.2d 267, 518 Pa. 59 (Pa. 1988).

Pincite

540 A.2d 267 (Fuhrman v. WCAB) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fuhrman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

515 A.2d 331 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)

Fuhrman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

540 A.2d 267 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)