Fuhrman v. WCAB
540 A.2d 267, 518 Pa. 59
This text of 540 A.2d 267 (Fuhrman v. WCAB) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fuhrman v. WCAB, 540 A.2d 267, 518 Pa. 59 (Pa. 1988).
Opinion
George FUHRMAN
v.
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (CLEMENS SUPERMARKET).
Appeal of CLEMENS SUPERMARKET.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
John R. Lenahan, Jr., Kathleen A. Lenahan, Scranton, for appellant.
Mark B. Segal, Philadelphia, Jerome H. Gerber, Irwin W. Aronson, James A. Diamond, Harrisburg, for amicus AFL-CIO.
Prior report: 100 Pa.Cmwlth. 577, 515 A.2d 331.
*60 ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fuhrman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
515 A.2d 331 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)
Fuhrman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
540 A.2d 267 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
540 A.2d 267, 518 Pa. 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuhrman-v-wcab-pa-1988.