Fuhr v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fuhr v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

131 A.D.2d 542, 516 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47998

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 8, 1987·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover on a policy issued under the Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance Act (5 USC § 8701 et seq.), the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Adler, J.), entered January 14, 1986, which denied its motion for summary judgment.

[543]*543Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with Special Term that a triable issue of fact exists with respect to the employment status of the plaintiffs decedent on the date of his death, April 14, 1980. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover on a policy issued under the Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance Act (5 USC § 8701 et seq.), the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Adler, J.), entered January 14, 1986, which denied its motion for summary judgment.

[543]*543Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with Special Term that a triable issue of fact exists with respect to the employment status of the plaintiffs decedent on the date of his death, April 14, 1980. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Fuhr v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 131 A.D.2d 542, 516 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47998 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

131 A.D.2d 542 (Fuhr v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related