Fugmann v. Theobald

Ohio Circuit Courts

Fugmann v. Theobald

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 720

Ohio Circuit Courts·Decided July 1, 1898·Published

Opinion

Swing, J.

We are oí the opinion that the same decree should be rendered in \ this court that was rendered in the court of common pleas decided by' Judge Wright, 4 Dec. 65 (2 1ST. P. 390), with the exception that we. think item 18 of the will is a valid provision, and does not come within i the provision of Sec. 5915, Rev. Stat., as to its being a benevolent, j I religious, educational or charitable purpose.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swing, J.

We are oí the opinion that the same decree should be rendered in \ this court that was rendered in the court of common pleas decided by' Judge Wright, 4 Dec. 65 (2 1ST. P. 390), with the exception that we. think item 18 of the will is a valid provision, and does not come within i the provision of Sec. 5915, Rev. Stat., as to its being a benevolent, j I religious, educational or charitable purpose.

Fugmann v. Theobald, 12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 720 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1898).

Pincite

12 Ohio Cir. Dec. 720 (Fugmann v. Theobald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.