Fugazy v. Time, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fugazy v. Time, Inc.

26 A.D.2d 535, 271 N.Y.S.2d 169, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3922

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 26 A.D.2d 535 (Fugazy v. Time, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fugazy v. Time, Inc., 26 A.D.2d 535, 271 N.Y.S.2d 169, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered on March 14, 1966, denying defendant-appellant’s motion for a protective order, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $30 [536]*536costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted. Plaintiff served written interrogatories in connection with a publication other than the one which is the subject of the action. We do not, however, reach the questions of whether this article, published subsequent to the article on which the action is based, can be the subject of recovery, or whether it is admissible in evidence. The subject of the interrogatories is whether defendant is responsible for matter published in a magazine called “Sports Illustrated”. Plaintiff in connection with the original article has already obtained all the information it needs as to defendant’s relationship to the latter publication and the interrogatories can serve no purpose. Concur -—■ Stevens, J. P., Eager, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on March 14, 1966, denying defendant-appellant’s motion for a protective order, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $30 [536]*536costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted. Plaintiff served written interrogatories in connection with a publication other than the one which is the subject of the action. We do not, however, reach the questions of whether this article, published subsequent to the article on which the action is based, can be the subject of recovery, or whether it is admissible in evidence. The subject of the interrogatories is whether defendant is responsible for matter published in a magazine called “Sports Illustrated”. Plaintiff in connection with the original article has already obtained all the information it needs as to defendant’s relationship to the latter publication and the interrogatories can serve no purpose. Concur -—■ Stevens, J. P., Eager, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 535, 271 N.Y.S.2d 169, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fugazy-v-time-inc-nyappdiv-1966.