Fugate v. State

456 S.W.3d 861, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1356, 2014 WL 6924614
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 9, 2014·No. No. ED 100521·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

David Ray Fugate appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fugate v. State, 456 S.W.3d 861, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1356, 2014 WL 6924614 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

456 S.W.3d 861 (Fugate v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.