Fugate v. Loughmiller

Supreme Court of Kansas

Fugate v. Loughmiller

123 P. 768, 87 Kan. 71, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 90

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedApril 6, 1912

DocketNo. 17,551

StatusPublished

This text of 123 P. 768 (Fugate v. Loughmiller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fugate v. Loughmiller, 123 P. 768, 87 Kan. 71, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 90 (kan 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This action was brought by the appellee to foreclose a real-estate mortgage on certain lots in Hollis, Cloud county. The appellants defended the action on the ground that the execution of the mortgage was procured by fraud. After the evidence for the defense was closed, the execution of the mortgage being admitted, a demurrer was filed to the evidence of the defense and was sustained by the court, and a'judgment of foreclosure was rendered.

We have read the evidence brought up in the abstracts and the briefs of the parties. No evidence has been called to our attention that we think is sufficient, taken as true, to establish a valid defense to the mortgage, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This action was brought by the appellee to foreclose a real-estate mortgage on certain lots in Hollis, Cloud county. The appellants defended the action on the ground that the execution of the mortgage was procured by fraud. After the evidence for the defense was closed, the execution of the mortgage being admitted, a demurrer was filed to the evidence of the defense and was sustained by the court, and a'judgment of foreclosure was rendered.

We have read the evidence brought up in the abstracts and the briefs of the parties. No evidence has been called to our attention that we think is sufficient, taken as true, to establish a valid defense to the mortgage, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 P. 768, 87 Kan. 71, 1912 Kan. LEXIS 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fugate-v-loughmiller-kan-1912.