Fugate v. Ferguson

1 Blackf. 366, 1825 Ind. LEXIS 21
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 18, 1825
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Blackf. 366 (Fugate v. Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fugate v. Ferguson, 1 Blackf. 366, 1825 Ind. LEXIS 21 (Ind. 1825).

Opinion

Scott, J.

The first plea claims a greater deduction from the amount really due, than is authorized by the statute. The second claims a credit on the obligation, only for the usurious interest charged, and the payment actually made. This plea is good in substance and sufficiently formal, the demurrer to it ought therefore to have been overruled

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hines v. Driver
100 Ind. 315 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1885)
Taylor v. Moore
2 Va. 563 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1824)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Blackf. 366, 1825 Ind. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fugate-v-ferguson-ind-1825.