Fuerst v. Stone

Appellate Court of Illinois

Fuerst v. Stone

192 Ill. App. 256

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 13, 1915

DocketGen. No. 20,505

StatusPublished

This text of 192 Ill. App. 256 (Fuerst v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fuerst v. Stone, 192 Ill. App. 256 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Assignments, § 31*-—what assignee must show. In an action by the assignee of a chose in action, the plaintiff must prove an indebtedness of defendant to the plaintiff’s assignor and the assignment of same to the plaintiff. 2. Brokers, § 5*—what is effect of failure to procure license. One acting as a real estate broker without a city license cannot recover commissions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Assignments, § 31*-—what assignee must show. In an action by the assignee of a chose in action, the plaintiff must prove an indebtedness of defendant to the plaintiff’s assignor and the assignment of same to the plaintiff. 2. Brokers, § 5*—what is effect of failure to procure license. One acting as a real estate broker without a city license cannot recover commissions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 Ill. App. 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuerst-v-stone-illappct-1915.