Fuentes v. Lerman
228 A.D.2d 643, 644 N.Y.2d 995, 644 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7440
Opinion
[644] It is well settled that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see, CPLR 5511; Matter of Paulucci v Baer, 215 AD2d 662; Murphy v Murphy, 212 AD2d 583; Kelly v Long Is. Coll. Hosp., 199 AD2d 244). The plaintiffs’ failure to appear at the certification conference constituted a default, and the proper procedure to challenge the dismissal is a motion to vacate the default (see, Kelly v Long Is. Coll. Hosp., supra). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fuentes v. Lerman, 228 A.D.2d 643, 644 N.Y.2d 995, 644 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
228 A.D.2d 643 (Fuentes v. Lerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kelly v. Long Island College Hospital
199 A.D.2d 244 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Murphy v. Murphy
212 A.D.2d 583 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Paulucci v. Baer
215 A.D.2d 662 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)