Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Fuentes v. Lerman

Fuentes v. Lerman

228 A.D.2d 643, 644 N.Y.2d 995, 644 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7440
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 24, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 228 A.D.2d 643 (Fuentes v. Lerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fuentes v. Lerman, 228 A.D.2d 643, 644 N.Y.2d 995, 644 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

[644]*644It is well settled that no appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing party (see, CPLR 5511; Matter of Paulucci v Baer, 215 AD2d 662; Murphy v Murphy, 212 AD2d 583; Kelly v Long Is. Coll. Hosp., 199 AD2d 244). The plaintiffs’ failure to appear at the certification conference constituted a default, and the proper procedure to challenge the dismissal is a motion to vacate the default (see, Kelly v Long Is. Coll. Hosp., supra). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kelly v. Long Island College Hospital
199 A.D.2d 244 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Murphy v. Murphy
212 A.D.2d 583 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Paulucci v. Baer
215 A.D.2d 662 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 643, 644 N.Y.2d 995, 644 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuentes-v-lerman-nyappdiv-1996.