Fuentes v. Kings Park Central School District

269 A.D.2d 492, 704 N.Y.S.2d 499, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1959

This text of 269 A.D.2d 492 (Fuentes v. Kings Park Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fuentes v. Kings Park Central School District, 269 A.D.2d 492, 704 N.Y.S.2d 499, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1959 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), dated February 17, 1999, which granted the motion of the defendant Kings Park Central School District to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered March 11, 1999, which, inter alia, dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Kings Park Central School District. The plaintiff’s notice of appeal from the order is also deemed a notice of appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5520 [c]).

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, so much of the order as granted the respondent’s motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it is vacated, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated; and it is further,

Ordered that the appellant is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The plaintiff’s action was not time-barred since he was not precluded from using the disability toll pursuant to CPLR 208 (see, Henry v City of New York, 94 NY2d 275). Ritter, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henry v. City of New York
724 N.E.2d 372 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 A.D.2d 492, 704 N.Y.S.2d 499, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuentes-v-kings-park-central-school-district-nyappdiv-2000.