Fuentes v. Jackson's Farming Company

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedAugust 9, 2002
DocketI.C. NO. 859146
StatusPublished

This text of Fuentes v. Jackson's Farming Company (Fuentes v. Jackson's Farming Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fuentes v. Jackson's Farming Company, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2002).

Opinion

***********
This matter was reviewed by the Full Commission based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Hall, along with the briefs and arguments on appeal. The appealing party has not shown good ground to receive further evidence or to amend the prior Opinion and Award. Accordingly, the Full Commission adopts and affirms the Deputy Commissioner's holding, with some modification, and enters the following Opinion and Award.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered by the parties at the hearing on 13 June 2001 as:

***********
STIPULATIONS
1. At all relevant times the parties have been subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

2. On 22 February 2000, Deputy Commissioner Lorrie L. Dollar of the North Carolina Industrial Commission filed an Opinion and Award in this case, finding and concluding that employee J. Carmen Fuentes suffered a compensable heatstroke on 10 July 1998, that employee is permanently and totally disabled, and that employee requires nursing care on a twenty-four hour basis for the remainder of his life. The defendants did not appeal these findings or conclusions made by Deputy Commissioner Dollar.

3. By Opinion and Award filed 29 November 2000, the Full Commission found and concluded that employee J. Carmen Fuentes suffered a compensable heatstroke on 10 July 1998, that employee is permanently and totally disabled, and that employee requires nursing care on a twenty-four hour basis for the remainder of his life.

4. From 10 July 1998 to 3 November 1998, employee was hospitalized at Sampson Regional Medical Center, UNC Hospitals, and Hospital Central in San Luis Potosi, Mexico.

5. From 16 June 1999 to 26 June 1999, employee was hospitalized at Sociedad de Beneficencia Espanola in San Luis, Mexico.

6. From 4 November 1998 to 15 June 1999, employee received twenty-four hour care from his father Porfirio Fuentes and sister Yolanda Fuentes. During this time, Porfirio Fuentes and Yolanda Fuentes each provided twelve hours of care per day.

7. From 27 June 1999 to 13 May 2001, employee received twenty-four hour care from Porfirio Fuentes and Yolanda Fuentes. During this time, Porfirio Fuentes and Yolanda Fuentes each provided twelve hours of care per day.

8. From 14 May 2001 to approximately 28 May 2001, employee received twelve hours of nursing care per day, six days per week, from two nurses (each nurse six hours per day) hired and compensated by Porfirio Fuentes at the rate of $7.00 (seven dollars) per hour.

9. From 14 May 2001 to approximately 28 May 2001, Porfirio Fuentes and Yolanda Fuentes provided twelve hours of care per day, six days per week (each person six hours per day), and provided a full twenty-four hour day of care on 20 May 2001 and 17 May 2001.

10. The defendants have paid Porfirio Fuentes $4,000 (four thousand dollars) for the nursing care he had provided to employee.

11. Aside from the payment identified in paragraph (10) above, from 4 November 1998 to the present, the defendants have not provided any nursing care to employee.

12. As reflected by the 4 June 2001 Pre-Trial Agreement filed with the Commission, the parties further agreed and stipulated to the admissibility of the following items without further authentication, subject to the right of either side to take deposition testimony from employee's treating physicians and medical care providers:

(a) Copies of records kept by Porfirio Fuentes and Yolanda Fuentes of the care they have provided to employee, identified as The plaintiff's Exhibit 1 (449 pages).

(b) Photographs taken by Bruce Holt in December 2000, identified as The plaintiff's Exhibit 2(wheelchair); Exhibit 3 (medical supplies); Exhibit 4 (fruits, vegetables cooking materials); Exhibit 5 (oxygen tanks); Exhibit 6 (mattress); Exhibit 7 (i.v. fluid bag); Exhibit 8 (exterior of employee's dwelling); Exhibit 9 (employee's head trach); Exhibit 10 (employee torso head); Exhibit 11 (employee diaper stomach tube); Exhibit 12 (employee torso head).

(c) Armstrong Associates facsimile transmission from Bruce Holt to Frank Bricio dated 5 April 2001, identified as The plaintiff's Exhibit 13 (4 pages).

(d) Hand-written receipt from Gloria de Leon Gaytan in the amount of $1,008.00 (one thousand eight dollars), identified as The plaintiff's Exhibit 14 (1 page).

(e) Medical records prepared by Raul Antonio Castillo-Lara, M.D., identified as The plaintiff's Exhibit 15 (9 pages).

(f) Copies of relevant portions of Ley Federal del Trabajo and English translation, including Chapters/Titles I, II, and III, identified as The plaintiff's Exhibit 16 (6 pages).

(g) E-mail correspondence produced or received by Bruce Holt, identified as the plaintiff's Exhibit 17 (16 pages).

***********
Based upon the evidence of record, the Full Commission enters the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. On 10 July 1998, J. Carmen Fuentes suffered a compensable heatstroke. From that date until the present, J. Carmen Fuentes has been in a coma or persistent vegetative state. It is abundantly clear from the testimony of J. Carmen Fuentes' father, the medical records contained in the Commission's file, as well as the undisputed findings of fact of Deputy Commissioner Dollar's Opinion and Award of 22 February 2000 and the undisputed findings of fact of the Full Commission's Opinion and Award of 29 November 2000 that J. Carmen Fuentes requires twenty-four hour nursing care.

2. The uncontradicted testimony of Porfirio Fuentes, the testimony of Defendant-Carrier's case management nurse Mr. Bruce Holt, as well as the stipulations contained in the parties' Pre-Trial Agreement filed on 4 June 2001, indicated that Porfirio Fuentes and Yolanda Fuentes have provided twenty-four hour care to J. Carmen Fuentes from 4 November 1998 to 15 June 1999, and from 27 June 1999 to 13 May 2001. Yolanda Fuentes provides twelve hours of care during the daytime each day and Porfirio Fuentes provides twelve hours of care per night. From 14 May 2001 to approximately 28 May 2001, J. Carmen Fuentes received twelve hours of daytime (8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.) care each day from two nurses (each nurse six hours per day) hired by Porfirio Fuentes.

3. Porfirio Fuentes and Yolanda Fuentes have provided outstanding care for their son and brother J. Carmen Fuentes. The defendants' own medical case manager describes the care provided by Porfirio Fuentes and Yolanda Fuentes as "superb" and better than the level of care that would be provided in a professional facility in the United States. Mr. Holt stated that the plaintiff had developed an ulcer while at UNC, but that it had resolved due to the great care the plaintiff was receiving from his family.

4. Throughout the day Yolanda Fuentes feeds J. Carmen Fuentes, changes his diapers, cleans his feeding tube to his stomach, cleans the tracheotomy, aspirates him, rolls him over every two hours (to prevent bed sores), provides massages, takes him out in a wheelchair, administers medication when necessary, and provides physical therapy exercises. Throughout the night, Porfirio Fuentes renders the same care to J. Carmen Fuentes that Yolanda Fuentes provides during the day. At the 13 June 2001 hearing, Mr. Fuentes was able to provide a detailed description of the care he and Yolanda Fuentes provide on a daily basis. Mr. Fuentes and his daughter also take J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

London v. Snak Time Catering, Inc.
525 S.E.2d 203 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
Godwin Ex Rel. Godwin v. Swift & Co.
155 S.E.2d 157 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Fuentes v. Jackson's Farming Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuentes-v-jacksons-farming-company-ncworkcompcom-2002.