Fuentes-Gil v. Zear LLC

2018 NY Slip Op 4964
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 5, 2018
Docket301746/14 7057 84043/14 7056
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 4964 (Fuentes-Gil v. Zear LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fuentes-Gil v. Zear LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op 4964 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Fuentes-Gil v Zear LLC (2018 NY Slip Op 04964)
Fuentes-Gil v Zear LLC
2018 NY Slip Op 04964
Decided on July 5, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 5, 2018
Renwick, J.P., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Tom, Gesmer, JJ.

301746/14 7057 84043/14 7056

[*1]Omar Fuentes-Gil, Plaintiff—Appellant,

v

Zear LLC, Defendant—Respondent. [And a Third-Party Action]


Talisman & DeLorenz, P.C., Brooklyn (Kevin Cowie of counsel), for appellant.

Havkins Rosenfeld Ritzert & Varriale, LLP, White Plains (Tiffany Fendley of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered January 9, 2017, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the cross motion by defendant Zear LLC for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about July 18, 2017, which, upon granting reargument, adhered to the original determination, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

Zear established that it was an out-of-possession landlord who, under its lease with the tenant, third-party defendant, was not responsible for removing snow or ice from the sidewalk of the premises where plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell (see Bing v 296 Third Ave. Group, L.P., 94 AD3d 413, 413 [1st Dept 2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 815 [2012]). Snow or ice is not a significant structural or design defect for which an out-of-possession landlord may be held liable (id. at 414).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JULY 5, 2018

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bing v. 296 Third Avenue Group, L.P.
94 A.D.3d 413 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 4964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuentes-gil-v-zear-llc-nyappdiv-2018.