Home/Ninth Circuit/Fue v. Biter

Fue v. Biter

835 F.3d 892, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14265, 2016 WL 4136976
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2016·No. No. 12-55307·Published

Opinion

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fue v. Biter, 835 F.3d 892, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14265, 2016 WL 4136976 (9th Cir. 2016).

835 F.3d 892 (Fue v. Biter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.