Fue v. Biter

835 F.3d 892, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14265, 2016 WL 4136976
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 4, 2016
DocketNo. 12-55307
StatusPublished

This text of 835 F.3d 892 (Fue v. Biter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fue v. Biter, 835 F.3d 892, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14265, 2016 WL 4136976 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
835 F.3d 892, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 14265, 2016 WL 4136976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fue-v-biter-ca9-2016.