Fudge v. Subluskey
This text of 177 S.E.2d 229 (Fudge v. Subluskey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We granted application for certiorari to determine whether the court of ordinary properly denied a motion seeking to vacate and rescind an order discharging an administrator, to cancel his letters of dismission, and to reinstate him and his surety. This issue had not previously been before the appellate courts of this State, and we deemed it of gravity and importance. Upon further consideration and with capable presentations by counsel for all parties, we have concluded that the judgment of the Court of Appeals, holding that the motion should have been granted, was correct.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 S.E.2d 229, 226 Ga. 728, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fudge-v-subluskey-ga-1970.