Fudge v. Subluskey

Supreme Court of Georgia

Fudge v. Subluskey

177 S.E.2d 229, 226 Ga. 728, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 656

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 8, 1970·No. 25914·Published

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

We granted application for certiorari to determine whether the court of ordinary properly denied a motion seeking to vacate and rescind an order discharging an administrator, to cancel his letters of dismission, and to reinstate him and his surety. This issue had not previously been before the appellate courts of this State, and we deemed it of gravity and importance. Upon further consideration and with capable presentations by counsel for all parties, we have concluded that the judgment of the Court of Appeals, holding that the motion should have been granted, was correct.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grice, Justice.

We granted application for certiorari to determine whether the court of ordinary properly denied a motion seeking to vacate and rescind an order discharging an administrator, to cancel his letters of dismission, and to reinstate him and his surety. This issue had not previously been before the appellate courts of this State, and we deemed it of gravity and importance. Upon further consideration and with capable presentations by counsel for all parties, we have concluded that the judgment of the Court of Appeals, holding that the motion should have been granted, was correct.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Fudge v. Subluskey, 177 S.E.2d 229, 226 Ga. 728, 1970 Ga. LEXIS 656 (Ga. 1970).

Pincite

177 S.E.2d 229 (Fudge v. Subluskey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.