Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Fudge v. State

Fudge v. State

95 S.E. 980, 148 Ga. 149, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 228
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 17, 1918
DocketNo. 851
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 95 S.E. 980 (Fudge v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fudge v. State, 95 S.E. 980, 148 Ga. 149, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 228 (Ga. 1918).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. Where one jointly indicted with others for murder is on trial, if there is no evidence of conspiracy and the person on trial did not inflict the mortal wound, a verdict of guilty can not stand. Dyal v. State, 97 Ga. 428 (25 S. E. 319); McLeroy v. State, 125 Ga. 240 (54 S. E. 125); Baynes v. State, 135 Ga. 219 (69 S. E. 170).

[150]*150No. 851. May 17, 1918. Indictment for murder. Before Judge Howard. Marion superior court. , February 9, 1918. W. F. Drane and George P. Munro, for plaintiff in error. Clifford Walker, attorney-general, C. F. McLaughlin, solicitor-general, and M. C. Bennet, contra.

2. Mere presence and participation in the general transaction in which a homicide is committed is not conclusive evidence of consent and concurrence in the perpetration of a crime by a defendant sought to be held responsible for the homicide as aiding and abetting the actual perpetrator, unless such defendant participated in the felonious design of the person killing. Whether or not there was such participation is to be determined by the jury under the facts and circumstances of the case. Brooks v. State, 128 Ga. 260 (57 S. E. 483, 12 L. R. A. (N. S.) 889); Futch v. State, 137 Ga. 75 (3 a) (72 S. E. 911).

3. The case having been submitted to the jury upon instructions contrary to the above principles, the judgment overruling the motion for new trial must be

Reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goins v. State
296 S.E.2d 229 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Reardon v. State
173 S.E.2d 706 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1970)
McCluskey v. State
93 S.E.2d 341 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
McClung v. State
57 S.E.2d 559 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Phillips v. State
57 S.E.2d 555 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Hill v. State
39 S.E.2d 675 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Patterson v. State
199 Ga. 773 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
McCorkle v. State
7 S.E.2d 332 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Daniels v. State
199 S.E. 572 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Jenkins v. State
183 S.E. 567 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Cooper v. State
180 S.E. 103 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Gower v. State
143 S.E. 593 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Johnson v. State
105 S.E. 603 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)
Crawley v. State
104 S.E. 410 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 980, 148 Ga. 149, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fudge-v-state-ga-1918.