Fucini v. Illinois

403 U.S. 925, 91 S. Ct. 2242
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 21, 1971·No. No. 122·Published·Cited by 19 cases

Opinion

Appeal from Sup. Ct. Ill. dismissed for want of substantial, federal question.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and case set for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fucini v. Illinois, 403 U.S. 925, 91 S. Ct. 2242 (1971).

403 U.S. 925 (Fucini v. Illinois) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People in Interest of TM
742 P.2d 905 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1987)
In re S.R.H.
449 N.E.2d 129 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1983)
In the Interest of Johnson
257 N.W.2d 47 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1977)
Carl Junior Higginbotham v. United States
491 F.2d 432 (Fourth Circuit, 1974)
State v. Horn
197 S.E.2d 274 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)
State v. LITTLE ART CORPORATION
204 N.W.2d 574 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1973)
State v. Lavin
204 N.W.2d 844 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1973)
United States v. Gundlach
345 F. Supp. 709 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1972)
Greenmount Sales, Inc. v. Davila
344 F. Supp. 860 (E.D. Virginia, 1972)
United States v. Green
284 A.2d 879 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1971)
Mitchum v. State
251 So. 2d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Washington Et Ux. v. United States
402 U.S. 978 (Supreme Court, 1971)