Fuchs v. Itzkowitz

16 N.E.3d 1260, 23 N.Y.3d 1045, 992 N.Y.S.2d 781, 2014 NY Slip Op 81781, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 1999
New York Court of Appeals·Decided August 27, 2014·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that the denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morris Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [1929]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fuchs v. Itzkowitz, 16 N.E.3d 1260, 23 N.Y.3d 1045, 992 N.Y.S.2d 781, 2014 NY Slip Op 81781, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 1999 (N.Y. 2014).

16 N.E.3d 1260 (Fuchs v. Itzkowitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bolt v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.
91 N.E.3d 1234 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 2018)