Fuchs v. Itzkowitz
16 N.E.3d 1260, 23 N.Y.3d 1045, 992 N.Y.S.2d 781, 2014 NY Slip Op 81781, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 1999
This text of 16 N.E.3d 1260 (Fuchs v. Itzkowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fuchs v. Itzkowitz, 16 N.E.3d 1260, 23 N.Y.3d 1045, 992 N.Y.S.2d 781, 2014 NY Slip Op 81781, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 1999 (N.Y. 2014).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that the denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morris Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [1929]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bolt v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.
91 N.E.3d 1234 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 2018)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 N.E.3d 1260, 23 N.Y.3d 1045, 992 N.Y.S.2d 781, 2014 NY Slip Op 81781, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 1999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuchs-v-itzkowitz-ny-2014.