Fuchs v. Heine

128 A. 680, 97 N.J. Eq. 548, 12 Stock. 548, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 320
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 17, 1923·Published

Opinion

*552 Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the oiiinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Church.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chiee-Justioe, Trenohard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 15.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fuchs v. Heine, 128 A. 680, 97 N.J. Eq. 548, 12 Stock. 548, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 320 (N.J. 1923).

128 A. 680 (Fuchs v. Heine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.