Fuchs v. Fuchs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fuchs v. Fuchs

208 A.D.2d 895, 618 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10684

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 31, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 208 A.D.2d 895 (Fuchs v. Fuchs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fuchs v. Fuchs, 208 A.D.2d 895, 618 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Kaiser, J.H.O.), entered October 5, 1992, which, after a hearing, granted the defendant wife permission to relocate to the Washington, D.C. area with the parties’ minor daughter.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We cannot say that the court, in granting the defendant mother permission to relocate with the parties’ minor child, erred in finding special circumstances under the totality of this case (see, Matter of Radford v Propper, 190 AD2d 93). Moreover, the record clearly established that the court’s ruling was in the child’s best interest. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Kaiser, J.H.O.), entered October 5, 1992, which, after a hearing, granted the defendant wife permission to relocate to the Washington, D.C. area with the parties’ minor daughter.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We cannot say that the court, in granting the defendant mother permission to relocate with the parties’ minor child, erred in finding special circumstances under the totality of this case (see, Matter of Radford v Propper, 190 AD2d 93). Moreover, the record clearly established that the court’s ruling was in the child’s best interest. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 A.D.2d 895, 618 N.Y.S.2d 569, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuchs-v-fuchs-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack