Fuchs v. Ecila Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fuchs v. Ecila Realty Corp.

243 A.D. 624

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 624 (Fuchs v. Ecila Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fuchs v. Ecila Realty Corp., 243 A.D. 624 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action brought to set aside certain conveyances in fraud of plaintiff, a creditor, judgment modified by providing that the collateral mortgage held by defendant Max Kramer, dated February 10, 1933, is a valid and subsisting lien on the property therein described and superior to the lien of plaintiff’s judgment. As so modified the judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs to appellant Kramer against the plaintiff, and with costs to plaintiff against the other defendants. Findings of fact and conclusions of law to the contrary are reversed and new findings in support of this decision will be made. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action brought to set aside certain conveyances in fraud of plaintiff, a creditor, judgment modified by providing that the collateral mortgage held by defendant Max Kramer, dated February 10, 1933, is a valid and subsisting lien on the property therein described and superior to the lien of plaintiff’s judgment. As so modified the judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs to appellant Kramer against the plaintiff, and with costs to plaintiff against the other defendants. Findings of fact and conclusions of law to the contrary are reversed and new findings in support of this decision will be made. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

243 A.D. 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuchs-v-ecila-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1935.