Fuchs v. Aaronsohn

32 Misc. 738, 66 N.Y.S. 1131
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 32 Misc. 738 (Fuchs v. Aaronsohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fuchs v. Aaronsohn, 32 Misc. 738, 66 N.Y.S. 1131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff’s claim was that at the time of the action the defendant wrongfully detained the chattels in question. The evidence showed that there was no wrongful detention, and, therefore, the judgment awarding the chattels to the defendant was proper.

The defendant not having unlawfully detained the property was entitled to recover, and as he had been deprived of the property it was proper that it should he restored to him, or that he should have its value. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Misc. 738, 66 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuchs-v-aaronsohn-nyappterm-1900.