Fuchs-Matta v. Pace Auto Parts, Inc.

34 A.D.3d 229, 822 N.Y.S.2d 710

This text of 34 A.D.3d 229 (Fuchs-Matta v. Pace Auto Parts, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fuchs-Matta v. Pace Auto Parts, Inc., 34 A.D.3d 229, 822 N.Y.S.2d 710 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Sheila AbdusSalaam, J.), entered October 19, 2005, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 624 to compel production of corporate documents, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record supports the court’s determination that respondents have produced all of the corporate books and records in their possession, and a fact-finding hearing was not warranted (see Business Corporation Law § 624 [d]; Matter of Lewis v J & K Plumbing & Heating Co., 71 AD2d 708 [1979]; Matter of S. & S. Realty Corp. v Kleer-Vu Indus., 53 AD2d 552 [1976]; Matter [230]*230of Botwin v Central Structural Steel Co., 28 AD2d 522 [1967]). The record establishes that the computer sought by petitioner was transferred as part of the sale of the corporation, a sale to which petitioner consented and executed a bill of sale. Petitioner’s allegations that respondent Matta withheld some of the records of the corporation are without evidentiary support. Concur—Tom, J.E, Mazzarelli, Andrias, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Botwin v. Central Structural Steel Co.
28 A.D.2d 522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1967)
S. & S. Realty Corp. v. Kleer-Vu Industries, Inc.
53 A.D.2d 552 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Lewis v. J & K Plumbing & Heating Co.
71 A.D.2d 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 A.D.3d 229, 822 N.Y.S.2d 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuchs-matta-v-pace-auto-parts-inc-nyappdiv-2006.