FuboTV Inc. v. The Walt Disney Company

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 16, 2024·No. 1:24-cv-01363·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FUBOTV INC., et al., Plaintiffs, -against- 24-CV-01363 (MMG) THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, et al., ORDER Defendants.

MARGARET M. GARNETT, United States District Judge: Attached hereto this Order is Court Exhibit 1, which is the consent list submitted by the parties to the Court of all exhibits admitted into evidence during the preliminary injunction hearing (the “Hearing”) held in this matter from August 6-12, 2024. The parties aae HEREBY ORDERED to meet and confer regarding unsealing of (1) the transcript of the Hearing, and (11) the underlying documents employed or referenced therein and, by no later than August 23, 2024, identify any portions of the Hearing transcript and exhibits that the parties jointly agree should remain sealed. The parties shall also identify any portions as to which there is disagreement. For any testimony provided by third-party witnesses (or documents produced by third parties) to this litigation, e.g., DIRECTV, the consent of those third parties shall be obtained before any such portion of the transcript or relevant document is designated to be unsealed. Any testimony provided in open court at the Hearing shall be considered by the parties to be presumptively unsealed. Furthermore, any portions of the Hearing transcript or portions of documents which the Court has included unredacted in the public Order and Opinion at Dkt. No. 290 shall likewise be considered presumptively unsealed. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 121 (2d Cir. 2006) (“[W]here documents are used to determine litigants’ substantive legal rights, a strong presumption of [public] access attaches.”) Any portions of the Order and Opinion which the Court has redacted shall remain sealed pending consideration of the parties’ submissions directed above and further order of the Court. Dated: August 16, 2024 New York, New York SO ORDERED. MARGARE United States District Judge

Case 1:24-cv-01363-MMG Document 292 Filed 08/16/24 Page 2 of 41

COURT EXHIBIT 1 Case 1:24-cv-01363-MMG Document 292 Filed 08/16/24 Page 3 of 41 fuboTV Inc., et al. v. The Walt Disney Company, et al. Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-1363 Admitted Exhibit List Exhibit Authenticity Admissibility Date Date Description Number1 Objection Objection Identified Admitted JX001 Email from G. Schanman to J. Blum re: Video Services Information, with attachment 8/12 Email from A. LeCuyer to H. Akhavan re: Programming Deep Dive on 1/5/24, with JX002 8/7 attachment Pls.’ Obj.: JX003 Email from J. Lancer to D. Espinosa, et al. re: A debate 8/12 Hearsay JX004 Astound Broadband - Global Agreement 1-1-23 8/12 JX005 First Amendment to Affiliation Agreement between Fox and Cox Communications 8/12 JX006 DISH-Fox Global Affiliation Agreement 8/12 JX007 Third Amendment to Affiliation Agreement between Fox and Mediacom 8/12 JX008 Global Affiliation Agreement between Fox and Verizon 8/12 JX009 Sixth Amendment to Fox/YT Affiliation Agreement 8/12 Pls.’ Obj.: JX010 Email from J. Nallen to M. Biard re: Potential partnership 8/12 Hearsay Pls.’ Obj.: JX011 Project Raptor OOC Approval Request Deck 8/12 Hearsay Pls.’ Obj.: JX012 Project Raptor: Future of Paytv and Implications of Flagship and Raptor Deck 8/12 Hearsay Pls.’ Obj.: JX013 Email from J. Lancer to K. Menzier re: Favor for raptor, with attachments 8/12 Hearsay Email from J. Nallen to J. Lancer re: Project Raptor: OOC Approval Request [Approval Pls.’ Obj.: JX014 8/7 Requested], with attachment Hearsay Pls.’ Obj.: JX015 Venu Deck 8/12 Hearsay JX016 Declaration of Alberto Horihuela in Support of PI Motion Defs.’ Obj: 802 8/12 JX017 Digital MVPD Affiliation License Agreement between TWDC and Fubo 8/12 JX018 Defendant Channel List Excel 8/12 JX019 Full Channel List 04012024 Excel 8/12

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FuboTV Inc. v. The Walt Disney Company, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

FuboTV Inc. v. The Walt Disney Company (FuboTV Inc. v. The Walt Disney Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)