FU

11 I. & N. Dec. 919

• Court: Board of Immigration Appeals
• Decided: July 1, 1966
• Docket: 1675
• Status: Published

Opinion

Interim Decision #1675

• . MAITER or Fr In Deportation Proceedings A-11013478 Decided by Board Deem-466 4 19, 1586 Since respondent, who entered the 17nitid States as an exchange visitor prior to June 4, 1956 and who was never thereafter granted an extension of eta,' as an exchange visitor, is not subject to the provisions of section 212(e), Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (22 OM. 42.91(c)), she is not precluded -from establishing statutory eligibility for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Act, no amended; therefore, motion is granted to reopen deportation proceedings to permit application for such relief. Oman: Order: Act of 1952—Section 241(a) (2) [8 118.0. 1251(a) (2)]—Nonimmi- grant—Remained longer.

The respondent, a native and citizen of China, appeals from an order 'entered by the special inquiry officer on. September T, 1860, denying a motion to reopen the proceeding to permit application for relief under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255). The Immigration Service does not oppose the motion. The respondent is a female alien, 63 years of age, who last entered the United States at the port of Rouses Point, New York on. July 28, 1953. She was then admitted as an exchange visitor until Octo- ber 27, 1953 under a fellowship to the United Nations. Her appli- cation for further extension of stay was denied on May 24, 1954. A warrant for her deportation was issued on April 13, 1959 and is outstanding. A petition for a preference classification under section 203(a) (2) of the Immigration. and Nationality Act was approved by the Immi- gration Service on July 13, 1962. Counsel maintains that a change of status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act is not barred to the respondent by section 42.91(c) of Title 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations since the respondent entered the United 919 Interim Deolsion: #1675 ' States as an exchange visitor prior to June 4, 1956 and was there- after never granted an extension of stay as an exchange visitor. Counsel maintains' that there is precedent for adjusting the status of an alien in the same position as that of the respondent. The special inquiry officer denied the motion on the ground that the respondent is barred from relief by reason of section 212(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act since she is an exchange visitor who has not been shown to have received a waiver of or to have complied with the two-year foreign residence iequired by law. We have carefully reviewed the provisions of 22 CFR 42.91(c). It relates to "an alien who Wesndmitted into the United States as an exchange visitor subsequent to June 4, 1956, or -who otherwise acquired the status of aximtchange visitor subsequent to June 4, 1956, including an alien granted an extension of the period of his tam-' porary admission stibbectuent to September i0, 1956 ." Sueh ian alien "shall not be eligible to apply for and receive an immigrant visa . ." tuilesd:he- meets the waiver requirements of section 212(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Since the respontlent•en- tered the.United StateS as an exchange visitor prior to June 4, 1956 and it• is alleged that she has never 'been granted an extension of her temporary admission as an exchange visitor, we will order the hear- ing reopened to permit application for relief under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended. An appropriate 'order will be entered. ORDER: It is directed that the. proceeding be reopened to per- mit application for an adjustment of -status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality' Act. ' It is further ordered that if the special inquiry officer grants dis- cretionary ' relief under. section 245 of the Immigration and Nation- ality Act, the outstanding order and warrant of deportation be withdrawn.