Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals of Texas

Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. Cunningham

142 S.W. 1198, 1911 Tex. App. LEXIS 762

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 8, 1911·Published

Opinion

KEY, C. J.

In the county court appellees obtained judgment against appellant for $415 damages for injuries and diminution in value, alleged to have resulted to a shipment of cattle from the negligence of appellant. A large number of similar cases have been before this court and other appellate courts in this state, and the case at bar presents nothing new; and therefore, as the judgment is to be affirmed, it is not deemed necessary to write an extended opinion. All the questions presented in appellant’s brief have been duly considered, and our conclusion is that no reversible error has been pointed out. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KEY, C. J.

In the county court appellees obtained judgment against appellant for $415 damages for injuries and diminution in value, alleged to have resulted to a shipment of cattle from the negligence of appellant. A large number of similar cases have been before this court and other appellate courts in this state, and the case at bar presents nothing new; and therefore, as the judgment is to be affirmed, it is not deemed necessary to write an extended opinion. All the questions presented in appellant’s brief have been duly considered, and our conclusion is that no reversible error has been pointed out. Judgment affirmed.

Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. Cunningham, 142 S.W. 1198, 1911 Tex. App. LEXIS 762 (Tex. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

142 S.W. 1198 (Ft. Worth & R. G. Ry. Co. v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.