Ft. Worth & Denver City R. R. v. Lamphear & Sanders

1 White & W. 127
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 7, 1883
DocketNo. 2640, R. Book No. 4, p. 276
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 127 (Ft. Worth & Denver City R. R. v. Lamphear & Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ft. Worth & Denver City R. R. v. Lamphear & Sanders, 1 White & W. 127 (Tex. Ct. App. 1883).

Opinion

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 308. Jurisdiction; judgment by default. Appellant was not cited to appear in the county court and answer the opposition to the award of the commissioners filed by appellees. [Rev. Stats, art. 4202.] Without service upon appellant of such citation, the court had no jurisdiction to render judgment by default against appellant. That appellant had also filed opposition to the award would not, we think, dispense with the citation required by law. Non-appearance by appellant to prosecute such opposition would not warrant the court in proceeding to a trial of the case upon the opposition of appellees, without citation served upon appellant. We think the judgment is erroneous in another respect. It should have described the land condemned, and vested in appellant the right of way therein. [Rev. Stats, art. 4208; Central R. R. Co. v. Merkle, 32 Tex. 723.]

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Central Railway Co. v. Merkel
32 Tex. 723 (Texas Supreme Court, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ft-worth-denver-city-r-r-v-lamphear-sanders-texapp-1883.