F.S. v. Danciu
This text of 770 So. 2d 254 (F.S. v. Danciu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although the decision is a close one, we find that there was substantial, competent evidence to support the trial court’s finding that the child had not lived with the grandparents for at least six months under section 63.0425, Florida Statutes (1999). See Lonergan v. Estate of Budahazi, 669 So.2d 1062, 1064 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996) (quoting Dunn v. State, 454 So.2d 641, 649 n. 11 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (Cowart, J., concurring) (defining the term “competent substantial evidence”)).
In June, 1999, the mother rented a trailer in Centraba, Illinois. She paid the July rent and all but $35 of the August rent. The trailer park owner testified by deposition that the mother told her that “[s]he was moving from her mother’s house and to get a place for her and her baby.” Although hearsay, this statement was admissible as an exception under section 90.803(3)(a)2., Florida Statutes (1999) to “[pjrove or explain” the mother and baby’s use of the trailer over the summer of 1999. In addition, the testimony of the other witnesses hinged on their credibility, which the trial judge was in the best position to assess.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
770 So. 2d 254, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14770, 2000 WL 1658284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fs-v-danciu-fladistctapp-2000.